Jump to content

Silas Leachman: "On This Day in Phonographic History..."


phonogfp

Recommended Posts

"On This Day in Phonographic History..."

 

August 20, 1859: Born: Silas Leachman, prolific pioneer American recording artist and possibly the first commercial recording artist in Chicago, making cylinders for the North American Phonograph Company’s local branch, ca. 1892.

 

April 28, 1936: Died: Silas Leachman, American baritone reputed to have made almost 250,000 cylinder recordings for the North American Phonograph Company, the Chicago Talking Machine Company, the Columbia Phonograph Company, and disc records for the Victor Talking Machine Company.

 

#antiquephonographsociety #phonograph #gramophone #antique

 

45005847_LeachmanSilas2.jpg.eebf3fade2bfb7c021741128af4f3bb8.jpg

 

1695164120_LeachmanSilasrecord.jpg.0f762e8c8c4cdbcf5b389c6b8c78a251.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's a good question, Dan!  This Leachman entry was a contribution from John Levin, so I'm sure he can cite the source.  I seem to remember an advertisement in The Phonoscope where a firm (possibly the Chicago Talking Machine Company) made a claim along these lines.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Dan,

 

Leachman made the claim in a Chicago Tribune article.  I agree that it stretches credulity, but let's assume that he made 5 cylinders per round and that each of those masters was used to produce 50 copies.  That's 250 copies/round.  Based on this math, making 1,000 recordings that translate into 250,000 copies is much more plausible.  

 

I wish we could ask him how he arrived at this number!

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I read something that referred to him as "old leather lungs". I recall that he recorded into a bank of recorders and spent most of his days doing so.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Analogous said:

Hi Dan,

 

Leachman made the claim in a Chicago Tribune article.  I agree that it stretches credulity, but let's assume that he made 5 cylinders per round and that each of those masters was used to produce 50 copies.  That's 250 copies/round.  Based on this math, making 1,000 recordings that translate into 250,000 copies is much more plausible.  

 

I wish we could ask him how he arrived at this number!

 

 

I guess with multiple records being produced at once it could be true. but it still seems a bit incredible to me. But, I don't doubt better experts than me. I've never heard one of his records that I remember. I will have to explore it. If he indeed made that many he must have had something people wanted to hear.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...