Tinfoilphono Posted April 2 Share Posted April 2 (edited) I'm starting a survey on Columbia Type N Graphophones to see if any useful patterns can be determined. If you have a Type N, either the regular home version or the scarcer coin-operated model, please let me know the serial number (either in this thread or by PM) and any pertinent details that come to mind. For example, early versions have the word "SWITCH" stamped into the on-off lever, but I don't yet know when this practice ended. Your information will be kept private, but I will share any useful data information that may come from this study. Thanks in advance! Edited April 2 by Tinfoilphono Link to post Share on other sites
phonogfp Posted April 3 Share Posted April 3 Here is an example of the conventional version of the Type N Graphophone. This one is #42660. The on/off lever is unmarked. This one happens to have a Chicago Talking Machine Company decal applied over the lower right-hand portion of the Washington DC Graphophone decal. Here's an N coin-slot. This one is #44981. Unmarked on/off lever. Also sporting Chicago Talking Machine Company markings. George P. Link to post Share on other sites
Tinfoilphono Posted April 3 Author Share Posted April 3 Thanks, George. I hope to get a lot more numbers. The dropping of the 'SWITCH' stamping remains a mystery. It happened somewhere after 40326 and before 41466, but that's a very wide gap. So far the only thing that is looking clear is that Thornwards are all in the 47,000 range -- well past conventional N production. Link to post Share on other sites
Fran604g Posted April 3 Share Posted April 3 Hi Rene, As you're aware I already provided some info to your survey elsewhere, but I thought I'd share a bit more here, for posterity. SN 41803 Case is typical except(?) for two ~2-inch x ⅛" notches cut into top left edge. No stamping on switch lever. A "The Chicago Talking Machine Co." decal covering the Washington D.C. portion of the Graphophone decal. No Gutta Percha reproducer came with it (as I suspect is the case for many). I assume the lid latches may have been the same throughout, but in case not, photo attached. I'm also attaching a photo of the motor, in case you might identify any significant changes over the course of production. Another source of pride for me is that the former owner (George Paul) contributed a very nice photo for the March, 2015 issue of The Antique Phonograph to accompany his article "The Type N 'Bijou' Graphophone", and has given me permission to share it here alongside my own images. It's merely a happy coincidence that it lives right next to an Eagle. 😉 Cheers, Fran Link to post Share on other sites
phonogfp Posted April 4 Share Posted April 4 5 hours ago, Tinfoilphono said: So far the only thing that is looking clear is that Thornwards are all in the 47,000 range -- well past conventional N production. Rene, My research suggests that the Thornward did not appear until the spring/summer of 1901 in Montgomery-Ward catalog No.69. See The Sound Box, March 2008, p.5-6. Fran, I get a twinge of regret every time I see that Type N! Still, I'm happy it's sitting where it is.😀 George P. Link to post Share on other sites
Tinfoilphono Posted April 4 Author Share Posted April 4 For sure, Thornward production was very late. I'm wondering now if the leftover topworks that Columbia recycled had already been stamped with serial numbers, or if perhaps they only stamped them (in a new 47,000 block) once Thornward production started. One curious data point at the moment is that there's a wide range from 43889 to 44981 which are all coin-ops (six in total). This is, of course, based on very limited data, but it's interesting. There's one coin-op well below that range, and one well higher, but that cluster comprises 75% of those recorded to date. I find it very unlikely that Columbia made a thousand-plus in a single run. I don't even believe they made anywhere near a thousand in total. Obviously we need more data! If you know of anyone with at Type N in their collection, please add it to the survey. Link to post Share on other sites
MikeSherman Posted April 4 Share Posted April 4 s/n 42815 with spiffy Empire State Phonograph Co. tag 2 Link to post Share on other sites
Tinfoilphono Posted April 4 Author Share Posted April 4 I'll second that comment -- I love that dealer tag! Link to post Share on other sites
phonogfp Posted April 4 Share Posted April 4 Back off, you two! Mike has already promised that machine to ME! (You do remember, don't you Mike? Old buddy, ol' pal?)😄 George P. 1 Link to post Share on other sites
Tinfoilphono Posted April 4 Author Share Posted April 4 This is slightly off-topic since it's on an AN, not an N, but it's in the family -- and it's one of the coolest dealer tags I've ever seen. 2 Link to post Share on other sites
Fran604g Posted April 4 Share Posted April 4 That's really nice Rene! Metal no less. Gorgeous. -Fran Link to post Share on other sites
Fran604g Posted April 5 Share Posted April 5 (edited) On 4/3/2021 at 5:02 PM, Fran604g said: Hi Rene, As you're aware I already provided some info to your survey elsewhere, but I thought I'd share a bit more here, for posterity. SN 41803 Case is typical except(?) for two ~2-inch x ⅛" notches cut into top left edge. No stamping on switch lever. A "The Chicago Talking Machine Co." decal covering the Washington D.C. portion of the Graphophone decal. No Gutta Percha reproducer came with it (as I suspect is the case for many). I assume the lid latches may have been the same throughout, but in case not, photo attached. I'm also attaching a photo of the motor, in case you might identify any significant changes over the course of production. Another source of pride for me is that the former owner (George Paul) contributed a very nice photo for the March, 2015 issue of The Antique Phonograph to accompany his article "The Type N 'Bijou' Graphophone", and has given me permission to share it here alongside my own images. It's merely a happy coincidence that it lives right next to an Eagle. 😉 Cheers, Fran I promptly forgot to post a photo of the motor in mine, my apologies. I understand that wonder if the earlier motors had a cast iron mainspring barrel, whereas mine has been replaced long ago with a brass one (the original cast iron barrel had broken). I'm not able to amend my earlier post, so I'm attaching photos of my motor here, and hope others might also for posterity. Rene, do you have information as to when (through serial numbers) the change might've taken place? I hope I'm not taking this thread too far off course. Cheers, Fran Edited April 5 by Fran604g Link to post Share on other sites
phonogfp Posted April 5 Share Posted April 5 In the course of examining a number of Type N and Type F Graphophones, as well as Macdonald motors that were sold to convert Class M Phonographs to spring operation, I noticed that the earlier motors had cast iron spring barrels - - as did Fran's No.41803. (It was broken - with a piece missing - when I acquired it, but I was fortunate in finding a partial Macdonald motor with an intact brass spring barrel.) As with other production changes in early talking machines, there may not have been an immediate switch from cast iron to brass, but in general only early Type N Graphophones will have cast iron barrels. George P. 1 Link to post Share on other sites
Fran604g Posted April 5 Share Posted April 5 Thank you, George. I'm always curious as to design/production changes. Especially the "invisible" changes most are/were not aware. Cheers, Fran Link to post Share on other sites
MikeSherman Posted Tuesday at 05:40 PM Share Posted Tuesday at 05:40 PM "Back off, you two! Mike has already promised that machine to ME! (You do remember, don't you Mike? Old buddy, ol' pal?)😄" Absolutely George. You get first shot on that one! 👍 Link to post Share on other sites
AudioAntique Posted Wednesday at 01:59 PM Share Posted Wednesday at 01:59 PM Hi Rene, Here is my contribution. This is a great topic. I've learned something. Rob 1 Link to post Share on other sites
Tinfoilphono Posted Wednesday at 02:38 PM Author Share Posted Wednesday at 02:38 PM What an exquisite example! And very early. Link to post Share on other sites
phonogfp Posted Wednesday at 06:29 PM Share Posted Wednesday at 06:29 PM On 4/6/2021 at 1:40 PM, MikeSherman said: "Back off, you two! Mike has already promised that machine to ME! (You do remember, don't you Mike? Old buddy, ol' pal?)😄" Absolutely George. You get first shot on that one! 👍 😄 Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now